Summer Place
Part Eleven
With
the Kimball brothers physical departure from their ancestral home accomplished
nearly six weeks prior to the actual sale of that ancestral property to the
‘summer people’… my grandmother encountered her first logistical problem in
gaining access to the estate to …FIND… and then purchase… for very nominal
amounts of money… the ‘good’ antiques in that …ancestral home. The problem was that once ‘off
property’ it was hard to get the brothers; either one or both together, to
return to the property to “do business”.
After several mixed result ‘late’, ‘forgot’, ‘slow’, ‘confused’ and
simply ignored “appointments” my grandmother took matters into her own hands.
She
requested forcefully to be allowed to roam the old estate without the brothers
there, find anything she wanted to buy, list that with the amount she’d pay for
it, submit that to the brothers with payment in full attached and… take the
things she found and wanted …with Charles’ help… “out” “then”. The brothers agreed and were ‘very
pleased’ for they not only sold “a lot” of the contents of the estate but
…didn’t have to “go there” to do it.
This is not an unusual procedure.
To this day I, in estate content purchases, am regularly ‘left alone’,
often ‘for weeks’ during a clean out.
The owners are always ‘happy’ they ‘don’t have to be there’. For our story, this settlement
…settled… frontier number one (Part Ten).
Again
I remind that this is in 1962. And
remind that therefore a VERY LARGE AMOUNT… including virtually all of the
contents of the ‘out buildings’ and ‘everything’ that was ‘not old enough’ in
the actual home… was not purchased or EVEN LOOKED AT other than a ‘quick
eyeballed’. When the day of the
sale of the property came, the Captain Merritt Kimball family estate property
was still jammed full of what today would be considered ‘rare’ and ‘valuable’
antiques. My grandmother …with
Charles at hand the whole time… did “go in every building and look at
everything” “several times”. As
earlier described, the property’s outbuildings were numerous and large (Part
Two). They DID find and take out
“whatever I wanted”. She always
said.
The
problem, for my grandmother, was that SHE was “not finding” what SHE wanted to
find and “expected to be in there”.
This lead to two repetitive utterances by my grandmother I heard for the
rest of her life. One was a short
utterance. The second was a long
‘saga’ utterance. The saga
utterance varied considerably in length when uttered. We will work with the full length of the sage
utterance. I was eight years old
when these utterances began and was twenty-eight years old when they
stopped. My grandmother died when
I was twenty-eight years old. I
still remember both utterances ‘clear as a bell’ ‘to this day’. This brings us back to the first
paragraph of the last chapter (Part Ten) and the usage of the words ‘exact obsession’,
‘two frontiers’, ‘dead eyes the foundation’ and ‘scripted pages of the
parable’. This is the second
frontier and: It is these word’s
meaning. It is the explanation
that becomes the ‘it’ of the canyon of Maine romance, summer people and ‘summer
place’.
The
first utterance is deceptively simple.
It was… and is… “I cannot find Sophia’s desk”. It adjusted after the …property sale… to “never could find”
or “never did find” “Sophia’s DESK”.
What desk? One would think
that ‘everyone’ would ‘know’, at the least, ‘what’ or ‘about’ the desk and the
merit of ‘finding it’ by the way my grandmother relentlessly uttered this
utterance. As it actually stood…
no one knew what she was talking about and… didn’t care. This included ME. Who cares about an old desk that
they’ve never seen and only some old crone utters about every now and
then. Further, my grandmother had
never ‘seen’ this “Sophia’s desk” herself. She had only… vaguely… “heard” “it” “is in there”. That was all she could ‘bring to the
table’ except that it was supposed to be a ‘Tambour” desk… what ever that
is. The only thing that was
cohesive about this utterance was THIS UTTERANCE. For myself, ‘a desk’ came and went constantly in physical
fact; just about as CONSTANTLY as I heard this utterance. This utterance, behind it’s
“deceptively simple”… is part of the “is” that …is the “it” (Part Ten). This utterance desk is “Sophia’s desk: She was the wife of Captain Merritt
Kimball. It was her desk that the
captain bought for her.” “In Salem”.
The
second utterance; the saga utterance, is based on the old china bowl my
grandmother hid in her china cabinet.
Before I relate the saga, I open the door with the need to define the
understood… by my grandmother… actual state of ‘religion’ on the coast of Maine
during the colonial era (1607-1776).
This is a strong point in understanding “why” things are the way they
are in Maine and …why… this does not include ‘summer people’ in their ‘summer
places’. This ‘actually lived’
state of religion is, for the most part, NOT known in… a short, concise and
foundation grade statement It is
hard to find a short, concise and foundation grade statement. I do have one:
“The
Puritan theocracy never took root in Maine. The manners of the frontier persisted. The people were not fond of churchgoing
and they didn’t go no matter what the clergy and magistrates said or did. They were in the habit of swearing when
they felt like it, and they continued to do so. Puritan laws to control drinking were disregarded. Maine continued to be a land of
personal liberty where the only active religion was that of human association
and friendliness. Together with
New Hampshire and Vermont, it constituted a frontier fringe where the most
practical kind of democratic equality lasted until long after the
Revolution.” Ernest Sutherland
Bates, AMERICAN FAITH, Norton, New York, 1940, pg. 103.
This
remains active to this day. This
includes Rufus Kimball’s rants (Part Two). It is why I used the word ‘parable’ (Part Ten). It is why I used the word
‘frontier’. This is an ‘unknown’
to ‘summer people’ in their ‘summer places’. It does explain ‘why’ things ‘are the way they are’ ‘in
Maine’.
And
why my grandmother hid the old china bowl in the back of her china
cabinet. It explains her ‘exact
obsession’.
No comments:
Post a Comment