Coy
Part Nineteen
"The Shoe Fits"
(B)
A
tapping came next. It was not a
tapping of this woman’s Topsider.
It was a tapping OF ME; a tapping of my antiquarian expertise for... as
usual with Janet... free. I was
introduced to the woman; “Chris” “Broadhead”. (?). It was
only “Chris” ever after. I say
here that... then (fifteen years ago)... and NOW... I am ‘scared’ by blue jean
wearing antiquarians (male and female) in addition to being ‘scared’ of anyone
wearing... clean... with lightest wear... crisply pressed... blue jeans...
period. In my earthy realms of
antiquarian plundering; the rummaging, ransacking, looting and ...carrying off,
I ‘don’t see’ ‘people’ (other humans involved in this plundering) ‘wearing’
‘them’. Nope; just don’t, across
the board. I DO SEE them worn in
antiquarian theatre but... I spy that from a safe distance and... veer
off. I’d already, with Chris and
her foot nodding, veered off. Her
blue jeans just ‘sealed it’. ‘Veering off’ is a ...tremendous... and
...primary... antiques picker skill... that is employed and perfected by
pickers such as I.
What
exactly ‘blue jeans worn’ means to antiques and the ‘trade’ of these ‘same’...
is NOT concise. It is ‘felt’; a
‘feel’. THAT roughly (fuzzy)
translates into ‘no money’ and ‘don’t know what they are doing’. THAT may lead to a further... state of
affair... where THEY (the blue jean wearer) DOES feel THEY ...do know what they
are doing... and that YOU (I) don’t know what your doing... so... a perspective
of “advantage”, etc, et al... manifests... smack dab in your face while your
standing there going “Is this person really that stupid?” The answer? “Yes: Never
over look the obvious”.
The
short way round this bush is to... FEEL... that IF someone is that ‘blue jeaned
UP’... with their blue jeans (and here throw in the Topsiders and socks)
‘PRESSED”, “CREASED”... they’s ah lot more on top of that then, well, hooking a
‘painting on old board’ “OUT OF THERE?” (Part Nineteen [A]) for ten bucks cash
banditry... and chucking it into the back of the truck – NOT doing as I did ...
of putting it behind the seat. I’m
ok with this; keep ‘em away.... KEEPS ‘EM AWAY. It’s what I call ‘the swagger factor’. In blue jeans, I can see that a mile
off. And... that swagger goes
EXACTLY where one... of common sense, would FEEL it would go. So I veer off.
But
here at Janet’s coffee table I was trapped. Sort of. As
fast as I veered off I ‘trailed’ my escape route. It is a standard classic I use all the time; ‘don’t be too
good’. LET the blue jeans... throw
me out. And why do that? Because in antiques land... it’s about
the stuff. It is not about your
pants. I ‘am about the
stuff’. SHE (Chris)... is about...
her pants. Her shoes. Her socks.... AND YOURS TOO.
“GOSH
IT’S SWELL TO MEET YOU!” is not what Chris said. She didn’t say anything. She just ‘took note’.
I know that directive too.
I defended myself by releasing the sensibility that... what ever I
said... about anything in the universe including my small world of expertise;
being an antiquarian... dealer... SHE is NOT going to... ANYTHING. So... therefore... “I’M FREE”
“TO
DO WHAT I WANT”.
Cocky...
but I have ...not only professional pride... but a ‘load’ in the truck parked
outside that PROVES IT. The
ping-pong match began.
Janet...
paddled the ball ...over the nets:
“Chris is STUDYNG her FAMILY TREE (personal genealogical record) and I
have been helping her with it. Her
family is VERY large. There are
many more people in HER tree than anyone’s I’ve WORKED WITH. It’s VERY interesting.”
I
looked at Chris from my chair and slightly nodded to the... nodding foot... in
a cognitive manor suggesting I was both on top of her interest and verified her
superior tree within that interest.
For example, ‘my family tree only has two people on it and they were
born yesterday’ is the proper ‘give ground’ response. Or does it be more crafty? Would I be using that old New England turned up side down tactic
learned so long ago in this tale of... falling back and fading away? (Part Six
[D]).
“We
made a lot of progress; a lot of compilation, at first. But NOW we spend most of our time
trying to TRACE individuals whose NAMES we’ve DISCOVERED but just don’t know
WHERE they fit in. Chris
DISCOVERED an old SAMPLER among the papers of her NINETEENTH CENTURY family’s
ESTATE RECORDS. She brought it
with her today.”
At
this moment Chris reaches to her right out past the nodding foot to a...
leaning against the back of the loveseat small frame having its frontal view
against the sofa back. She picks
this up, reverses it and presents it to my vantage. She does not hand it to me. I see, reporting both the rear than front views I get as
this action happens: Rear first, a
‘newly’ and ‘professionally’ framed... with brown paper back and the... requisite....
gold (or silver) modern framer’s label on a small, square and NEW frame. This is reversed to show me the frame’s
front with this being an ‘under non-reflecting glass’ sampler; a small, square
and typical school girl academy style ...first THIRD... of the nineteenth
century... ‘embroidered’ ‘sampler’ ‘with verse’... and little decorative corner
floral cartouches... AND including a lower center ‘basket of flowers’ AND...
‘with (an embroidered sewer’s) name’.
This last is, obviously the ‘the name’ of the ‘trying to TRACE’
interest. I cannot see any of this
clearly from my ‘across the coffee table ‘vantage’. That’s’ ok; it’s all the vantage I want anyway.
I...
‘hate samplers’. Actually I don’t
hate them and do, for each I see, ‘like’ them... in the professional context of
their decorative art heritage.
What that last means is that I ‘like’ a sampler for what it is and that
‘what it is’ sampler’s actual ...art merit. This means MOST samplers escape needing more than a
...passing glance.... Very, very,
very few samplers I’ve found were ‘loved’ by me. Unpleasantly... I am presented the ...opportunity to view
“WE FOUND IT. IT’S A SAMPLER”...
all the time. That is where ‘hate’
comes in. It’s not the
sampler. It’s the people. Who have found ONE sampler in their
lives and... obsessively... perform unnatural carnage upon ALL viewers of
“THEIR SAMPLER” for ...several eternities. THAT is happening right here, right now with foot nodding
Chris and HER SAMPLER. I am
already ‘gone’ because HER sampler is... an... “is one” of ‘art merit’
meaning... I don’t have to ...care.
But,
be assured, Chris does NOT feel that way about the “IT’S A SAMPLER” she
found. Nope: Chris has found ONE sampler in her
life. Before that ...she didn’t
know they existed. NOW she “LOVES
OLD SAMPLERS”. As entry level art
merit goes, that is not ‘bad’ or ‘hard to do’. The stumble is that beyond her ONE sampler... her LOVE OLD
SAMPLERS... doesn’t see ‘many’. Or
maybe even ‘another one’... especially IF the HER sampler has a “FAMILY NAME ON
IT” (in this case “WE THINK”). Further... buying and selling ‘old samplers’ as
“art” based on ‘art merit’.... or... and... ‘historic merit... does not happen
with Chris; NO MR. WALLET support from Chris to “LOVE OLD SAMPLERS”. That, of course, does NOT include “HOW
MUCH... is my very special sampler.... WORTH?”
“NOTHING”
I want to say. I can’t. I HAVE said... after saying how much I
would pay for a specific sampler... “that’s a lot of money for something you
can blow your nose on”. After a day
long rumination on THAT, ‘they’ ‘sold’ their sampler... ‘to me’. I actually look at it as I ...bought
it... from them. Here, with
pressed blue jeans and nodding foot... I can’t do THAT either. Nor do I WANT the sampler because...
it’s ‘not that good’. Not
mentioned by I (eye) and... ‘would scare the bee-Jesus out of (both) of them is
the... “GO AHEAD AND PROVE TO ME THAT SAMPLER ISN’T A... tawdry old ENGLISH
import ‘for the American (antiques) market. I mean... it sure could be... girls. I never have to get that far for THIS
SAMPLER? It, framed in a NEW
frame... is NFS (not for sale) EVER.
(“Thank you”).
“BECAUSE
IT’S A FAMILY NAME. WE THINK.”
“You
had it framed?
“Yes. The old frame was falling apart.”
“Old
frame?”
“Yes. It was falling apart.”
“Do
you still have that?”
“No. I was going to throw it out.”
“But
you still have it?”
“No. I gave it to the framer.”
“The
Framer?”
“I
was going to throw it out but he said it could use it.”
That
old frame... is ‘so sold’ now...:
Ms. Nodding Foot ...would ‘never believe it’. The FRAME could easily have been ‘better than’ (worth more
money) the sampler... meaning that in dollars and COMMON sense too. So I fell back and faded away further
BUT:
“SHE
NEEDS to find OUT how much it’s WORTH.
I told her YOU’D KNOW. BUT;
I mean... YOU KNOW but... this is for INSURANCE. You understand ME don’t you?” Said Janet. I
understand her alright; get the bailing buckets out I’m taking water.
“Yeah,
yeah... I got you. AH... IF...
it’s a family name better go HIGH at... say ...sixteen hundred. If it’s not... well... about half. IF your not SURE; better stay
high.” Wham-bang I did THAT real
quick and... stepped back behind a tree to ‘avoid getting hit’ by any return
fire. I didn’t ‘get any return’.
“MY
FRIEND who is an ANTIQUES DEALER said about the eight hundred but YOU are more
of the way I see it. I am sure
it’s a FAMILY sampler”.
“So
just tell him you want that value.”
“Oh...
he can do that?”
“Sure.”
“Oh.
YOU could do...”
“No. I don’t do appraisals”.
“Oh. No?”
“No. I’m not qualified.”
Janet
is looking at me ‘weird’. Chris...
sets the sampler back... face inward... on the sofa... and doesn’t say anything
more about it. Ever. She didn’t want my appraisal anyway...
but since it ‘doubled” the ‘shop price’ (retail in antiques shop price) my
utterance will ‘do in a pinch’.
Don’t worry... someone; a fine fellow no doubt, will... sell her
insurance ‘for it’. For the
record... I don’t insure ANY antique.
It’s about the stuff... not the money.
THAT
sampler ping-pong game went as... according to my wife on the telephone: “SHE HAS A SAMPLER FOR YOU TO LOOK
AT.”; the purpose of my... ‘stop’. I may leave now? NOT so quick and... “OH PLEASE.” I said back to Janet when
she:
“Do
you know that Chris thinks (as opposed to ‘feels’) the NAME on that sampler is
of one of the WOMEN who MARRIED one of the SAVAGES.”
“What
do you mean by that?” she said... after my utterance.
“That
could be... and it COULD BE some English school girl’s class work.”
“Oh.”
she said with no further comment meaning IN FACT ...that exposition... was not
only going in the ‘wrong direction’ but... was not understood. Then Janet continued “WE’VE FOUND
several MILLS names and ONE GIRL; a MILLS, married a SAVAGE in 1872.”
“That...
Ok... The sampler is probably 1820’s or earlier so... I mean; that fifty years
so what.... that girl would be SIXTY in 1872.”
“WELL
Belinda is one of the SAVAGE girls’ name.
That was in 1911.”
“Right. Could be then... I guess (meaning
throw-in-a-towel). You’ll get it
worked out.”
Chris
shifted on the sofa but did not drop her leg. The topsider nodded some more. I couldn’t tell what she was thinking. And I didn’t care.
“Mr.
(Dump) and his assistant (Crap Pile)
told us your still trying to buy the Savage family papers. You are aren’t you?”
“I
really haven’t gotten that far yet.”
“Oh,
well... the HISTORICAL society THINKS they may get MOST of the papers. Mr. (Dump) says he’s SURE they will get
all of the local history in the end.
We can’t WAIT for that because we can find Chris’ sampler THEN.”
I
said I was taking water earlier.
NOW I’m “going down’. Why
even bother to bail. The real
reason I’m here at Janet’s is that all of these... well intentioned idiots...
have been talking for MONTHS that “I” am “GETTING” the “SAVAGE” “ESTATE” and
have NO IDEA what that is about, means or IS? I... DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT The Savage Estate IS!
That’s
why I said Janet is an enabler (Part Nineteen [A]). She is. She
twaddles, prattles, babbles, serves coffee, invites over, says things like “OH
HOW WONDERFUL THAT IS!”, helps clean up, greets at the door, telephone calls
and generously name drops YOUR NAME:
She.... shows up... in the thick of things and is USED by... I can make
a list.
I
want her to enable me? I think she
IS enabling me RIGHT HERE. So how
come all I want to do is steal MY fork from her crummy silver plated “coffee
service” on its tray? I wonder
what she thinks of Chris’ blue jeans?
“Have
those two gentlemen given you any more photocopies of local archives?” I ask.
Janet
looked at me then said surely “They don’t GIVE those to us. We have to BUY THEM.”
“They’re
making you PAY for those? I
thought they donated those.”
“Oh
no: We have to pay.” She said.
No comments:
Post a Comment