Smocking Sugar:
The Divided Diamond of New England
“Is
the Smocking”: “Another early
design in early flint glass seldom seen outside of New England is the
Smocking”. This is Ruth Webb Lee
in her SANDWICH GLASS, Lee Publications, Wellesley Hill, Mass, 1966, page 510.
Yes...
I say. Just look that over again
noticing the phrase ‘is the Smocking’, the capitalization of the S of Smocking,
the ‘seldom seen outside of New England’ and....
The
‘she is queen’ Ruth Webb Lee... is... publishing, didn’t she, “there”
(Wellesley Hills). She is queen of
what? EAPG (Early American Pressed
Glass).
She continues with another
sentence: “The footed pieces in
the Smocking are all scalloped, which is an indication of its early age, for
scalloped feet are seldom seen in pressed glass though frequently on blown (New
England glassware)”. Her middle
sentence, dividing the two quoted, is “The goblet is particularly scarce”. One may bank that insight.
Lee
does not include or mention “Smocking” in her EARLY AMERICAN PRESSED GLASS book
(Northboro, Mass, 1946). That is
right: She does not. Remarkable... actually?
Actually
not: It (‘the Smocking’ glassware)
is... too... early?
She
does include it in her VICTORIAN GLASS.
Page 69 and Plate 25 (Northboro, Mass, 1946). Skimpy treatment there but I notice a ‘she says’; “appears
to be of only New England ancestry”.
In the plate she illustrated ‘the
sugar’.
“Oh.”
“So
what.”
That’s
the way I was with it (“is the Smocking”) for twenty-five years; from when I
was born and then raised in old New England decorative arts... found in old New
England homes. A quarter century
of being born and raised. Yes...
didn’t I just... “found” those... old glass sugar bowls that “is the Smocking”.
Yes: Didn’t I just.
I
remember very long ago... being in an old, old house and... it (the sugar bowl)
is... there... very clearly old glassware to even... well... I DO suppose one
needs a “SHOW ME”... but not too much of one: It IS old... especially when there is ‘nothing else around’
‘like it’. So I found that... there...
that day: A sugar bowl that “is
the Smocking”.
I
had it home. And looked at
it. A little beat up... from
actual usage. They all are; always
are. Make note of that. Then I set it to sell. No one ever asked. To buy.
Ever.
After
it had ‘set’ for so long that I had found another one ‘too’; they then ‘set’
together... I “gave up” (trying to sell them) and “put them away”. They were both WONDERFUL early American
glassware; ‘obviously old’ flint glass bell tone ring. Etcetera. So I didn’t just and ... I didn’t
know... or care to know... the “is the Smocking”
No. I just ‘put
them away’.
Soon...
I found a third... sugar bowl... that ‘is the Smocking’ in... another... old
New England home. I really had
quite a collection of... something that nobody buys and nobody knows
about. Forty-five years later...
I’ve found ‘a hundred’ of them?
No. Certainly twenty-five. Certainly thirty-five. Probably forty-five... if I include the
odd lids and odd bottoms... too.
“Certainly forty-five.” I say.
They
are all the same too. They all
look alike. They are all “always”
beat up. From actual usage. Many still have sugar in them. The sugar is protected ‘under the
glass’ (lid). White sugar mostly. Brown sugar sometimes. That’s older. Of course you know that. Hardened. All
of it. I used to clean the sugar
out. Now I never touch it. The old sugar stuck in the old New
England glassware sugar bowl... is beautiful... to my eye. The sugar bowl... “is the Smocking”. To my eye. I know that now.
Have for years. I’ve never
found them anywhere except in old New England homes.
I
found one in an estate in Sherburne, Mass. One in a home on Martha’s Vineyard. TWO (“a pair”) off of Route Seven below
Bennington, Vermont. One in
Orford, New Hampshire. One in
Lisbon, New Hampshire. And in
Maine? Certainly several
dozen. They are all over the
place... in old New England homes.
Always popping up. They
are. I always get them. No one wants them. No one knows anything about them. I won’t even touch the ‘is the
Smocking’.
Yet
at the same time... I have the same bad people... so sure that they ‘have’ and
‘know’ “New England”. They
don’t. They have never ever even
spooned brown sugar from an “ANY” sugar bowl. “Loaf sugar WHAT?”. And that is that:
Where
they are at.
It
has become obsessively clear to me that these ‘is the Smocking’ sugar bowls
were... one of... (your?) great... great... great... (1830-40) grandmother’s
(PROBABLY) first ‘tableware’ ‘glassware’ in her home. Peddler peddling “them” (“is the Smocking” sugar bowls)
(they are rugged little jewels so traveled well). He did not call them “Smocking”. That is a we-now-us-may. She (g-g-g grandmother) ‘liked it’. That’s it. Then she bartered (for) ‘it’ and insided it and filled it
and tabled it and it ... it... it... for, okay... forty years... until her
grandchild... ‘put it away’... “after she died”... ‘in the cupboard’ where it
stayed undisturbed until I
“Cleaned
it out”.
Every
one of the bad people are always telling me about the ‘old New England’. They are. And that includes the drapes, the chairs, the china, the
shoes, the lawn, the fountain, the horses, the cars, the “Take Ivy”, the “President
C-E-O” crap and the “GENE POOL” (DNA).
Today... with the ‘is the Smocking’, I speak of old pasture gates beside
the barn and the old Maple trees
Along
the road
Before
the farm.
“I
didn’t know that”
“Is
the Smocking”
“Too.”
I
always pick them (the ‘is the Smocking’ sugar bowls) up when I find them ‘going
by’.
George
and Helen McKearin notice “Smocking” with a single specimen; pg. 397 for Plate
207, #3, AMERICAN GLASS, Crown, New York, 1941.
Sometimes
Smocking is called ‘Divided Diamond’ but ‘Smocking’ is ‘old school’
New
England. So what.
If
I hate you and love the sugar bowl... does that make sense to you. No it doesn’t does it. Mr. and Mrs. Commercial Lie. The middle name is New England: Mr. and Mrs. Commercial New England
Lie. That is a gene pool.
The
commercial lie. There is no
commercial antiquarian market at all for an old smocking sugar bowl. I have never had anyone ever speak to
me (“inquire”) about the glass sugar bowl, the New England glassware sugar
bowls or an ‘is the Smocking’ sugar bowl.
I have ‘offered’ (had for sale) ‘is the Smocking’ sugar bowl(s) for
fifty years and no one has ever purchased one. Looked at one.
Picked one up. “Inquired”. Shown any knowledge of. Or. Even acknowledged that any ‘is the Smocking’ sugar bowl is
‘even there’.
Collectors
ignore; “too common”. At the
least? Or at the best? Thrift shops put a dollar on the lid
and a dollar on the bottom. Often
times they are two isles apart. I
have helped numerous ‘get back together’.
They were nearly separated by ignorance (idiots) after at least one
hundred and fifty years together.
“Nice of you to do that”
You
say.
From
the empires and islands of vanity of the new New England. The island is the box store. The empire is the parking lot. You have such good taste. I hate you and
Love
the sugar bowl.
Don’t
I.
What
if I was in an... old New England home and... they said... they are “keeping
that” and continued by saying “it is a New England glassware sugar bowl. It’s pattern...
“Is
the Smocking”.
“It
is”, continuing, “one of the... if not the... earliest pressed glass sugar
bowls ever made. It was designed
and created... molded and manufactured... in New England. The first and only place in the world
to do this”... with this... ‘is the Smocking’ ...glass ...sugar... bowl. “It was made no where else. Ever. It is beautiful and we love it. We have used it in our family for one hundred and
seventy-five years.”
What
if they said that?
To
me?
I
would be startled and very curious to know how much deeper their cultural sense
of heritage and history of old New England is: “If they know that”...
“What
else do they know?”
No comments:
Post a Comment