Layers
Layers,
in this essay, are not about egg laying poultry production.
Layers,
in this essay, are not about the clothing worn in Maine during the winters.
Layers,
in this essay, are about the ‘things’ (“the stuff”) in old houses and the role
the
Layers
of that “the stuff” play in my interest in pursuing an active excavation within
the ‘things’ found in the layers of the stuff within an old house. And: How I make very rapid intuitive decisions about the state of
the layers and their potential to harbor “good” antiques and rare books.
Layers
is about the behind my eyes walk through of what I see when I
Walk
through.
To
begin with, I am looking for layers.
Once I see them (sense them), I look at them “very hard”. I am told. Of course I never let on that I am doing
That.
I
don’t even ever tell anyone at all about layers.
And
very few people ever figure that out
Anyway.
That
pretty much leaves me alone... in an old house... looking at the layers.
“If
you don’t know... you don’t know” with this including the what... you... don’t
know.
Yes: There is that much of a bottom drag on
all this that the mire of that usually wins. ‘Winning’ is that the ‘the stuff’ in the ‘the layers’ is
protected and preserved for the ‘few people ever figure that out’ give up,
cease actions and... go away.
Presuming I have been “let in”... I then am ‘left alone’ with the layers
and... well...
That
is that.
What
does that mean? It means that the
next time any ‘few people’ go into the old house it is empty; it has been
‘cleaned out’. I did that. I don’t talk about that. I just do it. I take away everything including all the layers. I take away every... thing. That is what I do.
I
have to take away every thing so I may be sure that all ‘the stuff’ in the
layers of household contents is... “complete”. For example, I do not want to have you suddenly latching on
to, and keeping (taking out of the estate contents), your grandmother’s
teaspoon that she
Administered
her medicines to her self in addition to stirring her tea with it for
; SEVENTY-FIVE
YEARS.
It
is MY SPOON NOW; part of the LAYERS.
I
BOUGHT and OWN IT
Now.
IN
SHORT... I want it all; all ‘the stuff’ and all the layers, complete. Nothing is left out or left behind.
Of
course there are stupid people meddling with this by, well, “wanting”... stupid
things. A good example is a
“FAMILY” “PAINTING”. The house
contents “HAS ONE”; an ‘old’ ‘oil’ painting and it is too... an “I WANT”.
“Yes. Okay. Here we go.”
I
say that and finalize with “Take it:
It is all yours.”
Delighted, they scurry away clutching the “PAINTING”... too. Occasionally I am asked “what do I
think” of the “PAINTING”. For
these sorts of paintings I do not have to think and... carefully sidestep what
I actually ...feel... about the “PAINTING”. No reason to spoil such fun. Right?
What
am I conveying here exactly? I am
assuring that ...in most all cases... old “PAINTINGS” found in old New England
layered home contents are of little merit or value. The big feature is that they are “FREE” when found in an
estate so... continue the heritage of the painting as being ‘good’ because it
Allows
folks who have never owned a painting... who would never buy a painting (Yankee
Wasp characteristic)... who know nothing about “PAINTINGS”... have barely ever
looked at a “PAINTING” and... etcetera.... to ‘smug up’ about a truly crummy
‘thing’ that they found in the bedroom of long dead great-uncle George. “WHERE”
(what, how, why) “DID HE GET THAT!”
Great
Uncle George was a quasi trash picker later examination of his layer
reveals. But I never say anything
about that fine old cheapskate Yankee bugaboo. I, too, certainly do not stop the purloinment of the old
painting “within the estate” (private family distribution). A problem with this last is that the
purloin does not have an ‘appraised value’. I ‘don’t do those things’ (appraisals) I say when
queried. And... they DO ‘love’
“IT” (that painting) still: “It is
valuable”. What ever that means.
Turning
from an example of stupid people meddling and ‘wanting’ to the actual layer-e
(a plural), I advise from the get-go that that is where one should ‘seek’
layers. Most all of those
layer-e... who were any good at it... are
Dead.
But
look for “fondly remembered family” trails and you’ll start to notice, for
example, old but recent photographs of the short past generation’s grand old
bitch matron who ‘rode herd’ over the house, the family, the things, the stuff
and... their layers. Spot that
woman and you are way ahead of great-uncle-George (Dartmouth 1928)’s old
painting that I assure the Matron dismissed too.
Now
I with her, eye to eye including she KNEW what I KNOW... lets me tie off with
clothes line rope “HER” “DESK”.
That is, I tie the whole Grand Old Bitch Matron’s desk up like it’s a
crate full of “stuff” packed by the “FAMILY” in its drawers and... never looked
at...: If the Matron was alive she
would spend TWO WEEKS showing me EACH iota in the drawers ‘from her family’
but... as it is I am the best game in town so her ghost lets me tie it off and
carry it out... unchallenged. Yes
and that cubby is full of ‘all about the family’ including great uncle George
at Dartmouth in twenty-eight. She,
bless her ghost soul, gives me the maelstrom center of her layer whole. It proves to be the skeleton key to ALL
the home’s layers.
Traveling
from crummy old painting to tied off desk holding the family’s preserved
archive... are one sensing the meaning of layers? Who is doing better at this? Once I locate and purloin the master vault box I simply pile
the rest of all of the layers “in there” on top of this golden treasure chest
and... I don’t, once I remove all the layers undisturbed and intact... have to
touch them for years... should I choose. “Storage” is a big feature of my
antiquarian dealer side. And of
course... am I in some sort of hurry doing this?
No.
That
(hurry) is too... a fatal mistake.
Not in a hurry allows one to absorb the layers better (mentally and
physically). Six layers are like
reading a six volume family history (as if they are old books in dust
jackets). I enjoy studying the
souls of the layers for... as long as their intrigue lasts... preferring them
with a strong “dash”, that they are characters and too... “did something”.
May
I review?
Layers
are a multitude of ‘things’ (“the stuff”) that make them up. They are not ‘a thing’ or single things
or great things or fine things.
No. They are not an actual
old painting. But they are part of
a layer’s painting. They are the
gathered material residue of old dead souls; the stuff they ‘left behind’. They are little things in abundance
that ‘don’t matter at all’ until noticed that they are part of a layer. Perhaps even a very notable layer...
that is surrounded by other related layers of related layer-e dead souls. It (layers) do become quite rich and
reaching “very fast”... should one learn to look. For example the OLD SHAVING equipment for eight different
men of a time passage of one hundred and ten years... Each shaver was young, then old, then dead ‘in there’; in
THEIR layers. The shaving equipage
is “worthless” without the association; its role in the layer. The layer is worthless without its
soul. The soul is found in “the
stuff”. The more stuff in a
layer... It (an estate and its
layers) may become vivid beyond words and last for decades. By 1969 I had become familiar with and
knowing of layered estates. In
1973 I acquired my first full bore layers estate that “lasted for
decades”. There are still bits,
pieces and smidgens of that one around to this day.
“You
may not want to wipe the old pigeon dung off the chair when you get one (a
layered estate)” an old dealer advised me early.
A while ago there were many WASP'y, Grand Old Bitch Matrons around New England. They had more influence than they ever have been given credit for. And they knew about stuff, and the continuum of the layers of stuff. Good that you tell this story.
ReplyDeleteWashington Street in Bath is lined with grand old mansions once ruled over by grand old WASP matrons, "the Blue-Haired Mafia," a neighbor calls them.
ReplyDeleteThe last of the New England Square Rigged Dowagers
ReplyDelete