Hutton Loots
Cransmore – Part Two
“They’re
not salts” said Hutton. “They’re
GLASSES. That’s what she said they
were.”
“They’re
English salts.” I said. “By
antiquarian tradition. The sock’s
a nice touch.”
“She
didn’t have any bubble wrap in a dresser drawer (to wrap his purchases). I didn’t get them in the sock until I
had them in the front seat. Lucky
I had the sock”.
“How
much were the glasses?”
“How
much did I pay? Six dollars.” (Silent pause). “HER PRICE!” (Meaning Helen established the prices).
“Nice”.
“But
only a hundred each maybe”.
“Maybe”.
Hutton’s
salts are quickly explained best using Palmer’s GLASS IN EARLY AMERICA, a well
written early American glass reference tome using the Winterthur
collection. My photographs show
the relevant salt plate page and much of the text. Palmer defines the salt-not salt quandary AND notes the
abundant survival of examples that brings us Hutton’s “hundred each” wholesale
market price. The total is that
for early (1820) blown molded blue glass including color, pattern, pontil,
perfect condition, bell tone ring and …appeal… one of these salts is a decorative
bargain; a fine example of how “antiques” offer phenomenal quality value for
very little money.
By conjecture, Helen would have
bought these somewhere along the way in her decades of collecting, probably at
an antiques show for probably around sixty dollars each. She probably bought both at the same
time although possibly she “paired them up” herself. For Hutton to purloin these from her basement gathering is
no surprise for after owning them “for a while” they were “put away down
there”. As I said: “Nice”.
We had now completed the unloading
of the station wagon. Usual
etiquette allows prices to be asked and given as unloading takes place. In this case, with both Hutton and I
being experienced dealers and that total load content being of little
antiquarian enticement …to either of us for as we both engage near daily “loads
like this”… we do not “see” and are not awe struck by “anything” and… we do not
need to research anything because it is “not worth it” (it is just estate
stuff). We BOTH know that, in
total, including all and the salts too… it is a good quality lot that will sell
well “wholesale” IF one does not “charge too much”.
“How
much for all of it?” I ask. There
are two factors at play. One is
that this is the easiest way for the two of us to “buy & sell this”. Second is that it is the easiest way
for Hutton to get a selling price; he knows what he paid, …tacks on his profit…
and “done”. Anything else takes
time and patience and… the “stuff” “isn’t that good”. IF Hutton had sold to “The Gallery”… BY THE (individual) PIECE, by individual price…
including having to “pitch” or “puff” each thing to “I don’t know what it is”
(and include a current market summary too) new to the trade “buyers”...: “Tedious” and THIS does not need to be
discussed by us. Curiously, for
example, the two salts being a “best” in the whole lot… would actually be a
difficult sale to The Gallery
because not only would they cost more money so cause “hesitation” but also
would have to be “explained more” with this probably including having to “SHOW
THEM IN THE BOOK” just like… I did here.
“(Dollar,
dollar, dollars)” said Hutton who... probably had figured out that price on the
drive over to my yard AND adjusted it (tweaked it) as we unloaded it based on
“what I (Hutton) see” and “how he (me) acts” and “how I (Hutton) feel about
that”.
“Are
you keeping anything out?” I asked.
Silence.
“What?”
I said.
“A
goblet.” Hutton said and then went to burrowing into the mound of packing
material on the passenger’s side of the front seat from the driver’s side. He emerged with a Waffle and Thumbprint
early American pressed glass goblet; perfect, ground pontil, best quality high
clarity flint glass. Made by the
New England Glass Company (Boston area), I include photographs of Ruth Webb
Lee’s EAPG book and relevant text.
Again I “show them the book”.
“That?”
I said.
“They’re
not around.” He said handing it to me.
“And I like it. No one
knows what it is anyway… for what I can get for it (sell it for).”
“Ok.”
I said meaning he could keep it.
The goblet is beautiful.
Wonderful old glass. But
he’s right that… like the salts, the day to day commercial value does not equal
the goblet’s quality. Lee, in EAPG
speaks of both the quality and scarcity of the goblet.
“Anything else?” I queried again.
Hutton returned to his front seat
burrowing and excavated an old, cracked, chipped and broken bowl. He handed it out to me. “This.” He said.
I inspected the bowl. It is an 1840-1860 Japanese porcelain
serving bowl with red and blue hand painted floral decoration with applied gold
highlights. Old, it has multiple
hairline cracks, chips and two pieces broken out of the top rim that have been
glued back in place. Although
truly scarce and old, it is not “valuable” (worth any money) in this
condition. I rolled the bowl in my
hands, looked it over again.
Understated, it is pleasing to the eye even in its damaged
condition. “This too?”
“Yes.” Hutton replied.
“Why?”
“I like it.”
“After all of this?” I said waving
my hand vaguely toward the current load of antiques but more generally
referring to ALL of the endless parade of Hutton’s antiques that pass before my
eyes. He looked at me, at the piled antiques and at the bowl.
“It’s a little different” Hutton
said
“Different?” I said.
“It’s family. It was her great, great and greater
grandfather’s; Captain Snow’s.
Family. It’s the first I
ever got from her. What do you
think: She bought that bowl at an
antiques show?”
He was right; she did not buy that
bowl. THAT bowl… old Captain Snow
bought in Asia and… brought home… on his ship.
No comments:
Post a Comment